There is no escape from the stern logic of this conclusion.
If the soul were also born, then at death, or sooner or later after the death of the body, it likewise must die. The oak may live for centuries, the butterfly for only a few days or hours, both must die. That which has a beginning must have an end. Darrow offers further evidence that always there are those in every century who keep alive the sacred flame of truth. Though deeply loyal to the Christian thought-mold, they were yet profoundly influenced by the teachings of Pythagoras and Plato as well as the Kabbalah which the Renaissance had once again brought to the fore. No dogma, social or ecclesiastic, they affirmed, should override the innate freedom of man to choose the path best suited to him. One such group was the 17th century Cambridge Platonists which had its seeding in the rebellion of young men studying at the university who would tolerate no form of authoritarianism, whether of Hobbes or of Calvin. At one time they stand as lone sentinels, guardians of the Light at another, they are grouped in clusters, veritable constellations of luminaries, who brighten the horizon of human experience with the earnestness of their endeavors. Part I There is an imperishable wisdom of the soul that individuals of every age have sought to find and to live by.
#Destinies of the soul full#
would have been very helpful if the offer enquired into reasoning and meaning for some of us who suffered tremendously on this planet completely alone in full isolation and don’t see any return of the calm in a lifetime the future consequences to our abusers and perpetrators in the next life do not really help us in this one." On the Destiny of the Soul" by F. if it is real it seems strange that most of the subjects were presently or previously happily married to their soulmate and me being a single woman who is only seen abuse and suffering in her life cannot connect to those happily married people or maybe those who just lost a loved one yet enjoy the lifetime of support and love. This book made me question whether it’s based on real authentic research or just made up by the author. What is told in his books fits with what I'd figured out in general, but fills in much more detail. Everyone has to find what resonates with them and what they feel comfortable with. I consumed all the "New Age" stuff back in the day, but eventually found that too fluffy and airy-fairy for my tastes, though like organized religions, they have good intentions and have some truths. I am not religious but do believe in life after death and have pieced together my own logic from what I've read various places and what just makes sense to me.
He merely reports what he hears, he has no agenda. When I pay attention to his method, I'm really impressed with how he asks questions of his patients under hypnosis without implying the answer he expects. He approaches in an investigative and scientific way - he really didn't know where this would take him. The geekiness of the first book is what makes it believable to me: this is not a guy that is hearing only what he wants to hear and manipulating people into saying what he wants to hear. This seems to be easier for me to listen for hours and I really like it. I could only listen for about 15 - 40 minutes, then had to quit or stop and think about it, but it was very good and when I realized there was a second book, I had to get it. I listened to his first book "Journey of Souls" and liked it but found it a bit geeky and dry, but maybe that was only because I usually listen to fiction (thrillers and mystery).
0 kommentar(er)
